Also, note I'm using a throwaway account to say this. If I dare to offend the gay lobby by suggesting that homosexuality is a choice [1], or that companies should be able to refuse to do business with queers, for example, even a normally respectful community like HN is going to react as if I said we need someone like Hitler to run this country.
I'm even fearful that I might be refused employment [2] or otherwise discriminated against for my beliefs, if this comment is linked to my real-life identity.
If someone's best response to an intelligent person who disagrees with their position is calling them names like "bigot" or "hatemonger," and applying sanctions to them, it suggests, to me at least, that the actual argument is weak, and those who adopt these tactics do so because they know their position can't win a debate on its merits.
[1] If who you have sex with is not a choice under your deliberate, conscious control, why is rape a crime?
[2] Even in jobs where my beliefs have no effect on my ability to perform the work. What I think about gay marriage should have nothing to do with my ability to write effective unit tests, but I doubt a Bay-area employer would hire me if they knew I made this comment -- and even if they did, they would receive pressure to fire me from customers, investors, or other organizations they work with.
Does that mean you enter "0" if you're female and "1" if you're male?
If I were to launch a service where providing your gender was required (for the sake of this question), which options would you suggest I include outside the binary for those who feel uncomfortable identifying as such?
I can't imagine many scenarios when it is actually necessary.
I just found a good article about how doing Male/Female/Other is problematic, called 'The Gender Ternary: Understanding Transmisogyny' [1]
Diaspora solved this by making gender a text field [2]. Seems like the most inclusive.
[1] https://radtransfem.wordpress.com/2011/12/12/genderternary-t...