Hacker News Reader

Comment by antitrust | Hacker News Reader

> A program that you yourself benefit from tends to be less likely to get eroded by future politicians.

This could be bad. Very popular programs never get reconsidered, even if they have bad effects.

Just to help me better understand what you're saying, can you give an example of a program that's very popular, and which has bad effects?

home mortgage interest deduction?

For instance, Detroit has created pension obligations that it cannot possibly make good on, and is having some difficulty dealing with those as it is bankrupt. Many other local governments have similar programs, but are not yet bankrupt.

Surely Social Security wasn't meant to be the biggest item on the Federal Budget. I suppose you can argue about its popularity, but it has become enormous.

Would you mind mentioning any one thing which federal government does which should be more costly than providing a livable income to everyone over the age of 65?

Our Federal Government is not responsible for most of the major functions of governance because our states cover most functions. Also, we aren't at war with a major foreign power.

Prop 13 in California

California's Proposition 13 property tax law.

Much of the special exemptions relating to health care and insurance which effectively tie it to employment, while restricting the ability for other groups to form for pooled risk. Addressed somewhat under Obamacare.

Big Ag subsidies.

Patent and copyright laws.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com