Wouldn't it be possible to offer kits or services for chemical manufacturers, to test the level of binding of their chemicals, and define that above a certain level of binding , you're chemical have to be regulated in some way?
Wouldn't it be possible to offer kits or services for chemical manufacturers, to test the level of binding of their chemicals, and define that above a certain level of binding , you're chemical have to be regulated in some way?
I think. My understanding of the legal changes may be lacking here.
This is essentially the 'drug-discovery pipeline' that big pharma spends hundreds of millions on when developing new medications.
But if metabolism can transform said chemical , then sure, you've got to take it into account. But many of those drugs can be detected by pre-metabolism binding, i think.
This matters because it's not really appropriate to schedule chemicals which happen to trigger a response in a test-kit, but are not plausibly drugs of abuse due to side-effects, or lack of any reasonable mechanism of getting to the sites where they'd be active.
The "intended for consumption" is a convenient fiction for the head-shops and dodgy websites that sell such things, but actually having to test things which aren't intended for use in certain ways would be a massive imposition on, well, everything that uses chemicals[2].
There are heuristics that cover a lot of ground, and that's basically what the Analog Act tries to preempt, but there are still huge numbers of potentially active compounds we have no idea about. In-vitro binding studies are perhaps the next filtering step, but you still ought to have to demonstrate actual demonstrable plausibility of action for it to be a crime[3]. In addition, if you have something that feels like cocaine, but rapidly metabolises into a lethal neurotoxin or whatever in the same dose, it's not going to be a drug of abuse, except perhaps in suicides.
In terms of banning/restricting sale of things, maybe binding data would be sufficient, but I'm not sure just what the implications for testing & compliance for everyone involved would be.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prodrug
[2] Despite some TV adverts to the contrary, this would be everything.
[3] Leading to (IMO) the utterly bizarre world of fakes/illegal placebos, for which in many places you can be convicted for the same degree crime as the drug you purported to be selling, rather than say, fraud.