correct me.
your thought is that surveillance state enriches the pockets of those who run it by finding people to imprison?
Equipment to purchase, contractors to hire, subcontractors to hire, ...
States are likely to share its surveillance with the big corporations (who are much more powerful than elected politicians) to ensure that any union activists never ever gets a job again. It's a much better tool to maintain the status quo with than physical force. There is at least two dozen famous political philosophers who you can read for all the details.
Ultimately, it's about self-preservation and control. Control over citizens, corporations, the economy, and so on.
i see. do you think the people in the government are pulling the strings or is it the corporations?