Yes, but if it was opt-in...
Its nice if you can use groupcache as a memcache replacement even if some use-cases tie the hands of the implementation e.g. replication of hot items.
Its nice if you can use groupcache as a memcache replacement even if some use-cases tie the hands of the implementation e.g. replication of hot items.
The CAS must have an authoritative node (my mind wanders thinking about replication and failover) but the key it protects - with the version baked in - can be replicated surely?