(I wish people wouldn't downvote things just because they disagree with a statement. Downvoting because you disagree with someone is like putting your fingers in your ears and going blah blah blah I can't hear you and I don't want anyone else to hear you either. I wish people would save votes for comments that add nothing to a conversation. Like this one.)

He still murders people with flying robots. That's not very peaceful.

It was awarded upon the rhetoric of hope he espoused, but failed to follow up with in action. But your statement is factually correct.

Perhaps he was criticizing the Nobel committee, not the president?

I see nothing wrong with criticizing him for being undeserving of the prize, because he is.

It's not his fault, but a man of integrity would have called them out for trying to give it to him when he hadn't even done anything to deserve it.

The Nobel peace prize is pretty much a joke, former recipients include a pedophile and a direct supporter of terrorism. If I were Snowden, I wouldn't want one.

Many who voted for him bought into the rhetoric of change and even some "hope". He has brought things in Iraq to a close, a plus. However, domestically, he has been Bush++ and even amplified the crackdown on whistleblowers. Eric Holder, in some ways, makes John Ashcroft look quaint.