Happy Anniversary WWW | Hacker News Reader

Happy Anniversary WWW

jacquesmattheij.com

52 pointsbussetta12 comments

Well said, Jacques.

There are too many angry, ranty, sensationalist accounts of why online surveillance is A Bad Thing, and you put it in a calm & rational way.

I hope more people read this article and better understand the objections if they didn't already.

"It’s been a bit of a slow realization for me, but I don’t actually want to be safe, I’d rather be free and unsafe."

This, I believe, is the key tension in democracies. A majority of the constituents can be scared into compromises for "their security", not fully understanding what they are really giving up. A large number would rather "feel safe" than "feel free".

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin

That's a much easier quote to throw around than "Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_Free_or_Die or maybe "What is to be done? The answer is easy. It has always been easy. Stop saying 'not in my name' and start saying 'over my dead body'. That's what we did. It works. Do it." http://wlcentral.org/node/2818

It's also a weak form of stating the difference between the two possibilities.

In practice, "safe" often means "safe" and a slight possibility of being very unsafe (say, by being labelled a terrorist). Not to mention the (slight? inevitable?) possibility of future major abuse a la <pick-your-own-favourite-despot>.

I disagree with that statement. It's possible that he hasn't lost someone close in any kind of traumatic event that makes him so optimistic about it. Human nature compels people to want revenge or hatred towards say the same (religious) groups that the "terrorists" were from. This is very evident post 9/11. People hated muslims, destroyed their properties and discriminated them.

I think it's not time to be so care free. We don't even understand the universe yet. Of course I don't want survellience, but there has to be a requirement for saftey, and yes if that means putting bad people behind bars and make society advance faster so that we can colonize other planets, and understand how everything works better. There needs to be more scientists and engineers not more thieves.

of course, hide and downvote without giving an argument. This is not different from the freedom you want oh wait

Nobody has problem with putting bad guys into prisons. All civilized societies do this.

What I/we have a problem with is that everybody is treated as guilty, spied on etc.

This becomes even bigger problem when you consider that most governments consider anyone that is not with them to be their enemy. So in essence If you don't 100% agree and support government you are an enemy and then anything goes (spying, dronestrikes, ...).

Additionally I am not American, I don't even get a vote, but i am beeing spied on, and If I make to much fuzz them might decide to drone me. (As far as I know they haven't killed any EU citizens, but I doubt they would think twice). They also keep expanding who they go after, first it was just the Al Kaida and other terrorist, now its pretty much anyone USA doesn't like. So to put it bluntly I as a EU citizen am far more scared of USA than Al Kaida.

Are you serious? Despite the 1% spending to aid, US gives more aid to developing countries more than any other nation. You're scared because if you make a fuzz they'll drone you?

People that didn't like obama talked bad(even death) about him when he first became the president, they're still alive.

I don't support what the NSA is doing by spying on everyone but detaining someone of probable cause is necessary for saftey measures.

According to your view, US should've nuked North Korea already by now.

Obligatory link to http://howoldistheinter.net/

Does the Internet Archive project collect emails or cross any privacy lines? Will future Archive members be as benevolent?

(Should I go read the Archive's website and find out for myself? Probably yes.)

They don't collect email because that's behind a password protected access if it is web driven and presumably imap or pop if it isn't. So your emails are not stored by the IA.

I don't speak on behalf of the archive nor am I in any way associated with it but from a technical point of view the archive crawlers simply do not have access to your emails.

See the faq for lots more information:

http://archive.org/about/faqs.php

Reply on news.ycombinator.com