Yeah, it looks pretty bad. I guess it's just a matter of time unless everyone gets used to it. I think they should spend more time on their services than their branding, however. Playing with a logo is great, but in terms of value it's close to zero.
I avoid literally everything that is owned by Yahoo. This is almost entirely due to how they present themselves. A bad logo is evidence of a company that does not care about their products or services. They are finally making steps to improve their image.
> A bad logo is evidence of a company that does not care about their products or services.
So all bad logos indicate lack of interest by companies for the things they are selling? Maybe we can trade stock on that premise!