Hacker News Reader

In one of the articles linked from this one, the one on how to protect yourself, he says:

"Prefer symmetric cryptography over public-key cryptography."

I always thought asymmetric and public key was safer, so could someone clue me in on this?

One-time pads are probably what they meant to say instead of simply symmetric crypto. One-time pads are unbreakable, but the issue is transmitting the key to the recipient. Public-key crypo is so widely used because it offers a solution to key distribution. But in terms of theoretical security, public key crypto isn't as secure as a one-time pad.

No he didn't mean that. Scheiner constantly talks about how mentions of OTP are a key red flag for snake oil crypto. Yes the math is impeccable, but the implementation challenges are enormous. As this leak confirms implementation is a much bigger problem than the math.

I guess we interpreted the OP's use of "safer" in different ways. But, your point is well taken.

I interpreted this to mean that your private keys are probably not as safe as you think they are.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com