Hacker News Reader

You don't need to use javascript to hide/show matching elements. He also mentions something about it being faster than just an indexOf(), but gives no real benchmarks, so take that with a grain of salt.

View on HN

(Rereading again..) The JS claim is silly. He is saying that because we are dynamically creating a single style, that show/hide logic will be faster. I disagree with this, since adding a CSS selector to the page means the page needs to rematch that new selector against every element of the page and re-render each matching element, same as if we had just changed the matching elements with javascript.

EDIT: thinking on this some more, it actually should be a bit faster for huge collections, since javascript has to update items individually, whereas the browser has probably optimized this code path.

Well, it's fewer DOM manipulations, right? Touch a single style element vs updating a bunch of them.

It's fewer DOM manipulations from Javascript yes. The browser will still internally change the styles associated with the DOM elements, just without the JS overhead.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com