Wouldn't "non-clean" be cheaper then, if fewer precautions are being taken?
I took it to mean fast and relatively painless versus protracted suffering, i.e. "non-clean", messy.
I took it to mean fast and relatively painless versus protracted suffering, i.e. "non-clean", messy.
Without the 'respectively', it's ambiguous whether the clean or non-clean were the cheaper of the two alternatives.