the RSS numbers tell a different story
Mashable: 225,000
Techcrunch: 2,150,000
But then again for twitter, Mashable is leading techcrunch by about 100K. So there is probably some shenanigans going on
Mashable: 225,000
Techcrunch: 2,150,000
But then again for twitter, Mashable is leading techcrunch by about 100K. So there is probably some shenanigans going on
It seems 55% of Mashable traffic is coming in from search engines. If you look at their homepage, they are obviously heavily optimized for keywords like 'youtube', 'myspace' etc. (I got my stat from compete pro, cant link)
As a tech/valley person, I keep up with TC a few times a day but Mashable doesn't interest me at all. I am sure I am not alone.
I wonder how much less it costs to advertise on Mashable because the traffic is so much less valuable than Techcrunch's traffic.