Obama's efforts to control leaks 'most aggressive since Nixon', report finds
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
What a bunch of crap. Cherry-picked QA sessions are wholly irrelevant to policy transparency and accountability.
This is a very interesting quote from the article:
> The CPJ has made several recommendations to the administration, including [...] to guarantee that journalists will not be at risk from prosecution for receiving confidential and/or classified information.
Recently there has been a lot of rustling about redefining who are journalists and restricting/eliminating protections of "illegitimate" journalists.
Surely this quote will run directly contrary to who can be considered a journalist, especially since Senator Feinstein (of pro-surveillance notoriety) has come out against the notion that anybody with blog should be afforded the same legal protections as "legitimate" journalists.
Or, more to the point, anybody with a blog could be provided legal immunity after having been recipient of classified information for the purposes of journalistic publication.
Furthermore, Obama is a very image-conscious guy, so it's difficult to determine if he's sacrificing transparency in some regards for public image reasons or something else.
plus, we really didn't have this level of investigative ability before, whose to say Johnson, or even a war time President like Roosevelt didn't put more effort into it?
Perhaps as a people we have finally grown up and realized its not all what we were lead to believe. All those off hand jokes about the "man" have some basis in truth.
We're from the government, we're here to help. Funny how they know when and what.
It's happening in corporations, politics, colleges/universities, etc. It has been in place for some time, but not to the extent that it is now. It's continued pervasiveness into our culture is likely one of the root cause of so much that is problematic in these institutions today.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomaly_Detection_at_Multiple_S...