From the Start, Signs of Trouble at Health Portal
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Deadline after deadline was missed. The biggest contractor, CGI Federal, was awarded its $94 million contract in December 2011. But the government was so slow in issuing specifications that the firm did not start writing software code until this spring, according to people familiar with the process. As late as the last week of September, officials were still changing features of the Web site, HealthCare.gov, and debating whether consumers should be required to register and create password-protected accounts before they could shop for health plans.
One highly unusual decision, reached early in the project, proved critical: the Medicare and Medicaid agency assumed the role of project quarterback, responsible for making sure each separately designed database and piece of software worked with the others, instead of assigning that task to a lead contractor.
They seem to have not realized that this is a major engineering task in its own.
As I remember, they said "We just might be able to make one that works if you supply X, Y and Z" where X was clean power. Which the airport turned out not to be able to supply, probably along with some of the others.
On the other hand, eventually completely punting like I read Denver did is not an option for Obamacare, short of outright repeal.
Also check out reports that the back end is failing hard: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/federa...
Imagine you're an insurer and you get multiple reports of someone enrolling and canceling. If they don't jump on this real hard real soon, a lot of people will end up with no insurance through no fault of their own come Jan 1st....