Safety net for anyone provided by government must first take resources from individuals by force to provide it.
You pay attention to the "force" used on the taxpayer. When you do business in a jurisdiction then it often imposes taxes, but you are free not to do business there.
But what about the "force" used on the person living paycheck to paycheck? The government enFORCEs property rights (or, without government, it would be private mercenaries that do it) and so the wage earner is still forced to do what he doesn't necessarily want to do.
So although it may be that neither your employer nor any individual is coercing you to work for that industry, nevertheless you can be coerced by the system. Because what is force, really? Can you give me an example of force? Perhaps nanobots in your bloodstream forcing you to do something is force. Because if someone puts a gun to your head, you still have a choice: you can choose to die, or do what he says. The point is that force is whenever your alternative options are completely unacceptable to you. And homelessness / hunger for days are such things. Exposing humans to market discipline without ANY safety nets results in many of them being coerced -- not by an individual -- but by their circumstances -- to continue in a path that may not benefit them or even others. J K Rowling was for example able to make Harry Potter into a billion dollar industry only because she was able to afford to write it. She was a welfare recipient at the time.