With more notation, some readability is lost again:
Let x, b, c \epsilon C:
x^2 + b x + c = 0 => x = (-b +- sqrt(b^2 - 4c)) / 2
Let x, b, c \epsilon C:
x^2 + b x + c = 0 => x = (-b +- sqrt(b^2 - 4c)) / 2
Example of the difference: http://i.imgur.com/gwAqirx.png
generated by code:
\textbackslash{}epsilon: $\epsilon$ \\
Example: $x \epsilon \mathbb{R}$
\textbackslash{}in: $\in$ \\
Example: $x \in \mathbb{R}$
If you use \mathbin{\epsilon} instead, you'll get proper binary operator spacing, but you'll still get odd looks from people who are accustomed to \in. Admittedly, the symbol did historically begin as an epsilon, but that notation died off a while ago.