And then claiming others are arguing from ignorance. LOL.
And then claiming others are arguing from ignorance. LOL.
(1) Definitions: Misogyny is manifested in many different ways, from jokes to pornography to violence to the self-contempt women may be taught to feel toward their own bodies."
(2) Its clear from (1) That the media and workplace bullying are included in the definition.
(3) Its clear from the construct of 'many of the worst', that this refers to a non-trivial number, but need not be exclusive. So, the verbal threshold means 'many but not neccessarily all, and in any event not amount we need to further specify or approximate in specific percentages'. But, for the sake of it. The data I reference earlier implied that despite the higher proportion of total 'work bullies' in the workplace being men, a woman is as likely to be bullied at work by a woman. So, from the perspective of women, this is indeed a non-trivial amount. We can be reasonably say then that the 'some of the worst' bullies are other women, because this makes up half of the pool.
You are ignoring severity of misogyny, and instead referring to number of misogynists. Correct?
I'm saying, magazine (female or male) editors are by far not the worst, nor that common, among the TOTAL population of misogynists.
But by all means go and fight the "misogynist female magazine editor" fight... I'm sure it's worthy.
But lay off the ad hominem attacks, they just make you look like a jerk. (See what I did there ;) )
studies have shown that the more attractive an adolescent girl or woman is, the more likely she is to become a target for indirect aggression from her female peers.
“Women are indeed very capable of aggressing against others, especially women they perceive as rivals,” said Dr. Vaillancourt, now a psychologist at the University of Ottawa. “The research also shows that suppression of female sexuality is by women, not necessarily by men.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-...