So why Mozilla helped to kill WebSQL? Because NoSQL (IndexedDB) is so much better than SQLite?
Mozilla is too much focused on Brendan Eich baby. They should really move forward because JavaScript is becoming new IE6.
So why Mozilla helped to kill WebSQL? Because NoSQL (IndexedDB) is so much better than SQLite?
Mozilla is too much focused on Brendan Eich baby. They should really move forward because JavaScript is becoming new IE6.
IndexedDB is much less capable than SQLite, no doubt about it, but still very useful, and far far simpler and feasible to spec and standardize (which it has been).
In case of WebSQL, 40 years of legacy is not important. Millions business apps developers needs are not important. Clean and nice spec is more important for Mozilla guys.
However in case of Brendan Eich baby, legacy is very important. Ugly hacks like asm.js, without W3 specs, are promoted. Try to guess why.
http://www.sqlite.org/datatypes.html
which is different than most RDBMSes.
How is a language which all browsers implement comparable to an obsolete browser?
In any case, JavaScript is alive and well. Look at the continuous growth of node.js: http://www.google.com/trends/explore?q=node.js
Regarding node.js: http://pages.citebite.com/b2x0j8q1megb