Every year the same article. No one is forced to work at a temp agency or retail. If it sucks so much, find a different job.
Yes, yes, I know, it's not that easy. But it actually is.
Yes, yes, I know, it's not that easy. But it actually is.
Hell yeah. Get off your lazy ass, and go spend tens of thousands of dollars getting an education that makes you employable (just put aside for the moment the fact that your years of compulsory education left you good for nothing better than packing boxes). It's that easy, everyone. Economy down? Well maybe you should invest massively in industry and spark a boom so there are more jobs. If you aren't doing that, you're just not trying.
Or are they not fit for tech? Is there something that sets them apart and makes them lesser than your typical dot commer?
it's not easy finding a better job, and it's also not easy hiring better people. in fact it's real hard to do either of those things.
if you have, in fact, solved this fundamental problem of labor market efficiency, please go ahead and collect your nobel prize and be sure to explain it real slow for us dumb underachieving slackers during your acceptance speech.
when the number of people far outpaces the number of jobs, "just try harder" is not a solution to this problem. i'm pretty sure, in fact, that NEITHER conservatives or liberals think this is the solution to a massive correction in the number of jobs like the one the US just went through in the past 3 years.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm
"U-6 Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force"