We Rent Movies, So Why Not College Textbooks?
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
My understanding is that the textbook business is designed to be inefficient (from a student's perspective - and very profitable from a publisher's perspective).
The short lifespan and planned obsolescence of textbooks would make textbook rental a very difficult business without participation from publishers and colleges.
Nevertheless, this could be a tremendously useful service for college students so I wish them the best.
I think this varies quite a bit according to the field of study and the level of coverage of the topic.
To take one example: introductory calculus (which most undergraduates are required to take) textbooks can get away with this because students have little choice. They have to take the course, and so they have to get the book, and so the publisher essentially has a free hand, abetted by the academic bookstores which do quite well off the churn of new books.
But this isn't universally applicable. My degree's in philosophy, for example; I still have all the books, and nearly all of them are still in print in the same edition. Most of those have been in their current editions at least as long as I've been alive (fun data point: the teaching guide for one course -- not the text, the teaching guide -- has been in the same edition since the 1970s). The only things which change frequently are topical anthologies, which do need to be updated more often to track recent developments.
And anecdotally, I suspect that's a bit more common once you move out of the math/science area of most schools; the number of standard texts which simply aren't amenable to constant churn seems to decrease rapidly as you move over into the liberal arts.
Instead, I can just go sit at the engineering library for my two hours and answer the problem set.
As far as studying goes, you can usually find most information you need for class online that comes from a reputable source. Just make sure to double check that you didn't miss anything by reading over the chapter the next time you take out the book.
If there are 3 reserve texts for a 150 person class where likely 80% of the people in the class own the book/are not aware of the reference section, you can assume that you will be able to get a book reserved for a few hours at your leisure (or at least get on the waitlist).
The department wouldn't let you take key textbooks out of the library, but you could easily squirrel one away in a corner and work for days uninterrupted.
The bookstore had to hustle to get out its own signs telling students that this was prank and that no refunds would be issued.
I normally don't condone pranks but this one was pretty clever and it did send them reeling for a few days anyway.
Anyway, it is probably students' pent-up frustration in feeling trapped by this system that is the real "secret sauce" behind the success of this service. Lots of demand. All that was missing was an elegant solution.
a) they can buy in bulk and get a huge discount.
b) they only need to buy 1 set every 2-3 years. Saving money
c) they can decide when to update their edition.
And to pay for this, add a "Textbook surcharge" to each class pricing. This way the cost can be split between 6-8 students. So a regular $129 book, would be sold to university at $80, so each student would pay only $10 for the book.
Hell they can probably even make more money by donating the books to some 3rd world schools.
I mean, I can honestly say that I have not opened a SINGLE book since graduation. With Google there is absolutely no reason for students to keep books after the class is over.
I bought them cheap online, and then sold them to other students less than the price of the campus bookstore, online again, or if the price was right, back to the campus bookstore.
Don't mean to be snarky but I get the impression that the relationship between US textbook publishers and academia is really the worst of all worlds, and seems like a case of the free market gone wrong, with few colleges working to offer a competitive (ie cheaper) option to students who don't want to pay ridiculous prices for books.
Mind you, it's great for autodidacts like me who can pick up slightly older textbooks for less than the cost of printing. Now if only Spivak would do a new edition of his calculus book...
And the section numbers, case studies and questions get shuffled around too, so the previous edition is not sufficient.
The market is inefficient because the folks who choose which books to buy - the people who set the course - are not the people who have to pony up the costs. So it's in the interest of the publishers to maximize their gouging of students, and then spending a good fraction of the surplus on "incentives" for course setters to keep them on board and recommending the latest edition. The publisher who gouges the most has the most money to spend capturing these interests, creating a feedback loop, so for any given course vertical, there's a tendency to a monopoly.
I believe this eliminated the majority of calculus/linear algebra/diff-eq texts from introductory courses, so it has become easier to find used copies.
Anyway, to answer your question, sell them. I buy computer books that are an edition or two out of date because I'd rather pay $10 than $60+, and I can catch up up on the new stuff relatively easily. This works most of the time.
Cheap trick: get textbooks from amazon.co.uk - same edition, paperback, less than half the price. They don't jack the prices of the Euro editions to anything like the same extent that they do here.
I studied in London for a while and overall I enjoyed university life there more. But the libraries were really bad compared to the German ones. In Germany they would also frequently respond to my wishes and buy specific books, and they would order books from other libraries for free. And they did so even when I wasn't a student anymore.
I do know that the publishers didn't like the university doing this much. Also, it hindered the professors a little bit because they were pressured to keep their textbooks to a minimum and to keep the same text book for as long as possible, even if there was a good justification to switch. So, the text books had a reputation for not being the best things available for us students.
Doesn't really sound all that defensible to me...
-Fast Shipping -Great Prices -GREAT service -Easy to use app
I file them under the "if I had money" I'd invest in them.