I'm not arguing that bitcoin is very fungible; that is by design. I'm arguing that bitcoins, unlike gold, can be irreversibly destroyed.
Even the "leaks" from the gold supply are predictable and reversible. A lot of gold is used in electronics these days. It winds up either in recycling centres, where it can be recovered, or in landfill, where if the price of gold rises high enough it becomes commercially viable to mine the landfills.
Bitcoins cannot be un-destroyed. They are information without physical laws to guarantee their continued existence. Their manufacture and destruction are both one-way functions.
The supply of bitcoin will peak and begin an irreversible process of shrinkage.
Indeed, those who cannot steal bitcoin will be incentivised to cause the destruction of other's bitcoin. Call it the Bitfinger Scenario.