Dogecoin not notable
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Making a new Bitcoin derivative takes a few minutes. The Dogecoin developers didn't even bother to do a search/replace on the word Bitcoin in the source and documentation in the source. It is a very, very, half-assed fork of the Bitcoin code base (I looked, for a laugh).
Personally I consider it notable because they did in a week more than most altcoin did in their existence. Yeah the modification are nothing more than a CTRL+F with some joke added but what it caused is way more important than that.
Should we delete history for that? As small that history could be for you... I don't believe that. Some people suggested to merge it with Doge (meme) and it's not a bad idea, however I believe an altcoin that's currently worth nearly 3 millions deserve its own page.
I didn't make the rules, I'm just saying I believe Dogecoin fails to meet the qualification for notability. A few blog posts about it and a storm of facebook status updates does not "notable" make, IMHO.
The current network hash rate is 6100 MH/s. It's impressive for a 1 week old altcoin.