Vatican, Oxford put ancient manuscripts online
cbc.ca
cbc.ca
In parts of the European Union, the CC-NC provision essentially amounts to a complete uselessness of the document, because of the weird definitions of the word "commercial".
For instance, here in Germany, if you have a blog, no advertisements, make no money out of it, but you have thousands of followers, you are acting in "commercial scope" (ie. you are too successful to be non-commercial), thus inviting all the nastyness of being sued for commercial copyright infringement.
The only thing I can do with a CC-NC document without legal risk is to look at it.
The sad thing is, that now nobody will bother to scan these documents and put them online under a different license, since "they are already out there for free!!".
It is quite likely that nobody involved with the project knew this, which goes to show how dangerous the NC-provision is.
Also if license is in English, the English definition of 'commercial' should apply. It should be translated 'for profit' to German.
A number of juristicions do though. Including (maybe) the UK.
Personally, I am interested in Da Vinci's Codex Atlanticus. Is that available yet?
The buttons are small and people often hit the wrong one. Especially on mobile.