I was thinking, "please don't be Chinese" when I read the title. Fuck.
I was thinking, "please don't be Chinese" when I read the title. Fuck.
However, this researcher appears to be Chinese based on his previous publication history (he was affiliated with a university in Shanghai prior to coming to the states which is unlikely occurrence for a Korean)
He was previously affiliated with Yonsei University, located in Seoul.
Why, is this "a thing"? The closest thing I can think off the top of my head as another example is Hwang Woo-suk, but he was Korean.
This wiki page doesn't seem to have many Chinese names: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_misconduct
yeilds 7.660 million results
Its a generic and terrible stereotype, but then again | data
http://www.realclearscience.com/2013/09/30/china039s_black_m...
http://www.economist.com/news/china/21586845-flawed-system-j...
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/07/world/asia/07fraud.html?pa...
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-12/02/china-academi...
Again, not any excuse for an overzealous association but the data are out there.