If you could score the government contract to provide those services you'd make quite a bit money with stupidly large margins. It's a damn racket.
If you could score the government contract to provide those services you'd make quite a bit money with stupidly large margins. It's a damn racket.
I do think inmates are probably better off with work to do. I also think it's reasonable for society to garnish a chunk of the profit from their work to offset the cost of crime and punishment. Just my opinion, and at an abstract level rather than specific. I don't say the balance is currently right.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_for_cash_scandal for just one example.
It's also roughly the same number as North Korea has (no official numbers, just estimates).
So the US might not be the most heavy-handed when it comes to justice.
An indentured servant is not physically restrained from moving away, while a slave typically is. SO the jails are closer to slavery than bonded labor.
What? If they could just move away, then they wouldn't be an indentured servant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indentured_servant
> Runaways were sought out and returned.
The legal system of course returns an indentured person back, but an indentured servant still has some rights. A slave in the west has no rights.
Worse, the prisons actually get paid (a lot more) for providing these people to companies AND they get paid by the government to keep the prison system running.
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/02/nj_inmates_work_to_...
http://www.cqql.net/adrian.htm
The rate to do email is only a nickle a minute.