Verizon says it received over 321,000 legal orders for user data in 2013
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
Still the numbers are beyond phenomenal, bordering on insane. Just how does one go about validating that all these request are remotely legal, let alone how does one go about generating so many requests!
This article ( http://www.cbsnews.com/news/verizon-att-get-most-bucks-from-... ) is for wiretap fees but has this info: "AT&T, for example, imposes a $325 "activation fee" for each wiretap and $10 a day to maintain it. Smaller carriers Cricket and U.S. Cellular charge only about $250 per wiretap. But snoop on a Verizon customer? That costs the government $775 for the first month and $500 each month after that".
According to this ( http://www.cnbc.com/id/101178369 ) article: "The C.I.A. is paying AT&T more than $10 million a year to assist with overseas counterterrorism investigations by exploiting the company's vast database of phone records, which includes Americans' international calls".
So yes I'm sure assisting government agencies in this way is quite profitable.
When they get a big public backlash about a thing like this the company's lawyers pop in and remind you of the policies, demand to see that you are following them, etc. but no change occurs.
some of these could be just cops targeting suspected criminals who have nothing to do with terrorism. Also, I suspect a very large number may just be divorce cases or civil proceedings.
They don't ALL have to be tied to terrorism necessarily.
I can't even fathom how many there must be if you throw in Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, AT&T, Sprint, and countless others.
Given that Verizon isn't the only telecom operator in the US, the percentage of people under surveillance is quite significant.
And I assume this is only non-secret requests, we've heard news about such requests that are accompanied by a gag order which probably wouldn't end up in transparency reports.
Furthermore, the vast majority of these requests are subpoenas (161K) which can be issued in divorce proceedings or legal tussles over car accidents (was the driver texting?) among other uses.