Myths about Financing Start-ups that Hurt Entrepreneurs
smallbiztrends.com
smallbiztrends.com
And just for the record, 25K is about 3 months of modest living for a team of 3 in SF/NYC/Boston. Then you should start generating ~20K/month of revenue to support yourself. Zero to 20K in 3 months? Good luck with that.
An "average" successful startup goes through several rounds of funding, just look at some recent exits and see how many of them took 25K or less.
About bank financing: the "myth" is true. You won't use it. Banks always tie their loans to either solid revenue history or personal obligations of the founders. It won't be any different from taking a home equity, don't do it.
Tech startups aren't restaurants: they have zero revenue for the first 1..3 years. That's why looking at federal reserve stats for small businesses is pointless. Getting a loan to run a roofing business isn't the same as getting a loan to sit and code for a year.
An excellent reason not to do a startup in one of those cities. They are expensive to live in and full of tempting and expensive distractions. If you're serious about bootstrapping a web startup and can choose where you live, then living in an unglamorous place with a great net connection is one of the easiest ways to stretch the time you have before funds run out.
None of the above items are essential to building a successful internet startup, but like most things in life there are tradeoffs.
Ok, so if I was in bad a mood, I'd make fun of this professor of entrepreneurship, who never enterprised anything? Pontificating about startups from a cushy desk job is one thing. Actually doing it and speaking from experience is another entirely. Sorry about the rant.
I see a lot of these types of statistics in articles about startup financing. As far as I know, there's no publicly available database of VC transactions.
Anyone know where these numbers could be coming from?