Hacker News Reader

Comment by ItendToDisagree | Hacker News Reader

"But they built the last mile so they should be able to do whatever they want with it..." /sarcasm

You know that comment is coming to this discussion at some point.

Wish there was a good answer to this. Making internet connectivity a 'utility' has its downsides and upsides. It really is becoming a pressing issue though (and not just because of netflix being slowed).

View on HN

weren't they payed with tax money to build the infrastructure?

Sort of, my understanding is that they mostly received tax breaks with possibly some subsidies.

Either way, they received an incentive to do so.

Verizon got something like $10billion in cash to build FiOS out in New York...and never did

I've heard this before. How can they "get away" not building it, legally speaking? Makes no sense to me in this context

Because of how the contract was worded, they didn't have to actually provide the service just "attempt" to or something like that

Because the bill that awarded them the funding was written in a way where there were no repercussions for not doing so.

Varies by municipality, but pretty much everywhere the "last mile" is a local monopoly, granted by the town, county, or city with the rights to do so. And so long as that's the case there's no real competition and thus no way for Internet users to route around these abusive practices of their ISPs.

What's funny is that now the incumbents have the monopoly (paid for using taxpayer money) they're pushing to prevent new competitors like Google fiber from working with the municipalities at all: http://consumerist.com/2014/01/30/kansas-legislature-wants-t...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com