There might not be a Safeway or a Kroger, but there are still places to buy groceries.
http://i.imgur.com/Ey903PW.png
Really tied of the media exaggerating the term 'food desert'
There might not be a Safeway or a Kroger, but there are still places to buy groceries.
http://i.imgur.com/Ey903PW.png
Really tied of the media exaggerating the term 'food desert'
I'm not denying that the term "food desert" is suspect, I just can't tell what you're trying to prove.
The idea of a "food desert" as I understand it is that it's an area with limited access to nutritious foods. Most of Camden definitely qualifies, especially for residents without cars.
I assume the notorious Dunkin' Donuts store is still operating in Camden.
This article has been given the full "MATT TAIBBI" treatment. Of course he's a writer and wants to sell magazines.
He didn't add a "to be sure" phrase he is going for maximum gullibility of the readers to get emotion and engagement.
For example:
"where oblivious tourists pour in every year, gobbling cheese steaks and gazing at the Liberty Bell, having no idea that they're a short walk over the Ben Franklin Bridge from a full-blown sovereignty crisis – an un-Fantasy Island of extreme poverty and violence where the police just a few years ago essentially surrendered a city of 77,000."
So the definition of "oblivious" is "not aware of or not concerned about what is happening around one."
That would seem to imply to me that they have some kind of an obligation to be (when they are going on vacation) aware of what is happening across the river (and out of site) in a major city in the US. As if they are the CEO and aren't aware that there is sexual abuse going on and hey they should be. No such requirement exists. That they feel bad or should have some clue. Sorry not the case. Work hard, make money, take family on vacation. Saving the world do that on a different trip. Why not skip the trip and give the money you would spend to the poor people of Camden? Good for you.
Note also the triviality of "gobbling cheese steaks and gazing at the Liberty Bell" juxtaposed against true tragedy. Why does that matter? It doesn't but it provides color to the story and contrast. (By the way Philly is way more than cheesesteaks and the Liberty Bell I wish the media would get off of that already with the city).
Tourists of course are most likely aware that there is poverty somewhere in any big city. There is also plenty of poverty in North Philly but Taibbi doesn't focus on that (and that's just as close and in the same city).
By the way I wonder how many people going to Rock Concerts are "oblivious" to all the things that go on with respect to musicians, drugs and the drug trade? Or do they just want to hear good music? That's fine, right?