The whole point of FOSS is to be able to see what's going on, for freedom and control to the user. At this point I barely see Android as any better than IOS, aka, a very pretty jail for the user.
The whole point of FOSS is to be able to see what's going on, for freedom and control to the user. At this point I barely see Android as any better than IOS, aka, a very pretty jail for the user.
I run CyanogenMod Stable on my phone, the kernel build date is given as Sep 23 2013. Are they really meaning to imply that no security advisory published for Linux after that effects CyanogenMod? Most are purely local attacks, but still therefore malware vectors, and then there's things like CVE-2013-7027, which on the face of it should effect Android.
At the moment, I'm running CyanogenMod purely under the assumption it'll be more secure than the default Samsung installation (no updates in about two years), as at least it gets updates! Yet, at the end of the day, I see little to convince myself they are actually keeping up with upstream security fixes. No Android distribution seems to have a coherent story when it comes to security advisories, sadly. :( (I have a Galaxy S2, if anyone wants to convince me to try another distribution/OS!)
And for anyone wondering about privacy/FOSS tools in general, the EFF put together Prism-Break site has been constantly updated.
There are lots of exploits, and every time someone publishes a rooting method that does not require "fastboot oem unlock" (gingerbreak, ashmem, mempodroid, exploid, etc) it's one of the CVEs being exploited.
You are lacking perspective if you think that: 1) a completely open source phone is easy to make 2) iOS and Windows phone are on par with Android's level of openness
Edit: people downvoting, state why please