First, the astonishing price paid is a very tangible indictment on the management of Facebook, and Zuckerberg especially. Combine this $19 billion with the Snapchat offer and Instagram, and it's clear that Facebook is looking frighteningly like Microsoft, which is to say a behemoth of a company that seems to flat-out miss every next big thing. I can't even imagine how many more things Facebook will end up buying because they failed to build a good product themselves. If I was a shareholder (and I'm not, anymore) I would sell today and never look back. In a world where actions speak louder than words, Facebook is telling us they simply don't have the ability to create value internally.
Second, this is an absolutely perfect microcosm to describe the ever-expanding wealth inequality. I'm not saying this as a lament, just as an observation. Technology has fundamentally changed the way that wealth is created, and I believe it's the single largest cause of the wealth gap. Think about it. Thirty years ago, what would it have taken to create $19 billion of value in a new company? How many thousands of employees would it take? How many years, if not decades of hiring people, paying them, paying suppliers, providing pensions, etc? By the time that company was worth $19 billion, so many people would have been involved...that wealth would've been very spread out. Today, thanks to technology, $19 billion was created in a couple years, concentrated in just a couple dozen people. Folks, there is no escape from this. The genie is out of the bottle.
It's not that a revolutionary social service shouldn't be worth billions, but What's App is messaging. And messaging in the long term could just as well boil down to a specified standard with half a billion apps out there that support the standard.
There's no reason why messaging should be a market that can be dominated by a single player over more than the social network percolation timescale.
That said, this is a staggering amount to pay. I'm not familiar with Facebook's financials, but I'm surprised they could even afford this. I'd chalk this up to Zuckerberg's paranoia about no longer being #1 and less to a bubble.
Companies in 1998/99 weren't lacking in users. ICQ was purchased for $400 million in mid 1998, and had over 80 million users a year later (over 100 million by 2001). It too was run by a thin team, of just 70 people total (quite the accomplishment considering the technology of the time).
It's not? They had users back then, too.
The last bubble, people thought than making stuff available online was enough (Do X but on the internet). The first crisis taught us you need to have an actual business model and a way to acquire client.
But then, Google happened. Big user base can be monetized. So we have a second bubble where acquisition of user is the main driver, with the assumption than like google they will find a way to milk their users. At some point that bubble will explode too.
They spent on WhatsApp $4B (cash) and $(12+3)B (in stock). $12B is nothing when you have $173B.
If the $173B evaluation is correct, it's a totally different story. But as long as people think it's correct, Facebook can profit and buy any competitor with investor's money.