Killing Email: How and Why I Ditched My Inbox
zenhabits.net
zenhabits.net
I got rid of IM though, that was simply too much of a distraction, so much 'stream of consciousness' because of the too-low barrier that it becomes overwhelming. Email has just the right barrier of entry to me, it is relatively cheap for me to check and a lot of work on the part of the sender. If I'm not interested the cost is near 0, if I'm interested it can go quite far.
Also, for anybody in bussiness for themselves not checking email is a limiting move imo, snappy response to email is very much appreciated by customers and collaborators alike.
Only email the people that you really have to email with, keep everybody else in a junk folder. Block all but the five or six IM names you'd care to have a live conversation with. You'll find it impossible to waste your time.
I've been using email for 20 years, and I only receive work-related mail (that I read at appropriate intervals to my workflow), the occasional personal email, and specific automated emails that are filtered to specific folders (where I can give them attention when I need to). I never receive chain mail or stupid jokes, because I don't deal with the type of idiots who send that kind of stuff. Those who did send me that sort of stuff were told in no uncertain terms that I'm not interested in it, and it stopped immediately (this doesn't mean I was nasty about it, though).
I almost choked laughing when he said he was ditching email for Twitter. Twitter is possibly the least efficient and reliable Internet-based communications medium. And I say this as someone whose profession is software to make greater sense of that medium. Was this piece meant to be satire? It just seems ridiculous to me.
1) The communication itself 2) Whether the communication is even necessary
That is a positive.
6. A few types of emails will get through for now. My filters allow emails for advertisers, interviews, refunds, and people who want to hire me, to get through to my inbox [...] I’m working on automating these processes via the web
Even if he 'automates processes via the web' that's still having to spend time to read, process, and deal with text content sent by others. Rather than ditch email, he seems to have put forward a plan for receiving less of it.
Not doing so wouldn't be ditching email, that would be ditching communication.
It's going to be an interesting experiment because people are not really expected to reply back to every message on Twitter, so will people get ticked off if Leo doesn't reply to tweets?
If Leo had instead responded only to really important emails and not every single email, would he have achieved the same results?
I hope Leo posts an update on the same two months from now, would like to see if he has indeed got rid of inboxes (irrespective of whether it is email or twitter)
Prioritization would go a long way to getting the problem solved.
Stuff that's urgent I take care of when it reaches me, stuff that is to be taken care of goes on the back burner until I have a spare moment, some stuff I never get around to. That's life. It applies to just about everything from maintaining a house to managing your communications.
People still call me for non urgent items, like calling me on the weekend to remind me to do something on Monday.
Even worse, phone calls with list of feature requests and bug reports. I'd be so happy if these were all written down in an email - even better if they were entered directly into the bug tracker.
But for me, I'd rather check my Inbox than Twitter.
And I'd rather people emailed me than called me, since most of the time they'd get a voicemail which I would have to pay to retrieve, and then I'd call them and it wouldn't be convenient, and then ...
And while some things (think long discussions) are done better verbally than by email, there's a lot of other things (like Reports from clients, or my global office) for which email is the only alternative to actual mail (since, and again this is for me, the chances of any of them diving into Google Docs or Wikis in the next 3 years is negligible).
I love email. Why? Because I'm a programmer and I don't want to be interrupted. I like to keep the day-to-day things simple because my work is anything but simple.
I use gmail and everyone I know has my gmail address. It has excellent spam filters and it's easy to manage. Best of all, it never bothers me. When I'm ready for a break, I check and manage my email. It takes 5 minutes, just enough time to eat an apple.
Family, close friends, and some business associates have my cell phone #. They know not to text me because if I'm working, I will not respond. If I'm not working, the only response they'll get is "ok". If the phone rings, I know it must be important to talk. Usually not for long, then back to work.
I do not IM. I do not Twitter. I can't imagine worse ways to ruin productivity. I IM'd for 3 days. I got nothing done, so I emailed everyone to never IM me again. Email me and I'll respond when I'm available.
I surf my favorite sites (especially hn) during breaks. When the break is over, on go the headphones and up comes my text editor. See you in an hour or two. Not before then.
How do you enforce your breaks? I'm still trying to beat some self-discipline into me.
I don't "enforce breaks". My body lets me know when it's time. My critical path is usually eyestrain, but it could be anything.
"I'm still trying to beat some self-discipline into me."
Don't. You can't win that battle. Even if you do, it will only be temporary.
I look at it completely differently. I absolutely love what I'm doing so much that I have to pull myself away for breaks.
Do you love what you're working on? If so, discipline will never be a problem. If not, then why not? Solve that problem and discipline will never be a problem. Either way, discipline is never a problem. Working on the right thing and devouring it is the solution.
You don't worry about enforcing discipline when you're eating a great meal, partying, or having great sex, do you? Find a way to make your work like that and you'll never worry about it again.
I prefer email because it is asynchronous. I can respond at my leisure. I use IM a bit more, but almost exclusively for work purposes (we have a distributed development team) and to talk to my wife during the work day--no other personal correspondence. I found that even in GMail's Chat, that if I set my priority to "Busy" or whatever, people still bugged me (which of course, kinda makes sense--if I didn't want to be bothered, I shouldn't be logged in).
Perhaps I'm lucky--between my work account, and two personal accounts, I don't get an unreasonable amount of email per day. Perhaps 10-15 personal messages, some list traffic (which I can easily ignore), and perhaps 5-10 work messages.
I've not Twittered, either.