Older white males hurt more by this recession
usatoday.com
usatoday.com
The overall unemployment rate stands at 9.5% today and averaged 9.3% in the second quarter. While I have sympathy for anyone involuntarily unemployed, it seems like white men over 55 are doing relatively well all things considered.
It's also a question of what unemployment does to you financially or psychologically. At 55, the damage from 6 months off the books could be a lot worse then 25 or 35.
They are more likely to be inflexible in their spending. They are more likely to be frantically saving for retirement. They are also more likely to get demoralised. You can go from "I have 30 years experience. You can't buy that." to "No one wants to hire a middle aged employee" very quickly. They may have more of an emotional attachment to their work identity: a foreman, a manager. A 30 year old fired from a middle management job forced to temp as a receptionist is likely to be demoralised. A 55 year old in that position might be a lot worse off. I wouldn't be surprised if the older one turned down these positions or (more likely) never apply for them to a greater degree then younger people. Taking the opportunity to retrain in a new 'career' is also less likely.
I had never stopped to think about this before. Is it a common assumption that one's earning power peaks in one's fifties?
Most salaries are based on seniority or else on skills and abilities. Although those are not the same thing by any stretch, they both normally are correlated with age, though of course there are numerous exceptions.
Seniority takes time, and only time, to build up. So while the older people do not necessarily have seniority, the young necessarily do not.
Skill, experience, and knowledge generally improve with age, especially amoung the ambitious that continue taking opportunities to improve those. Even more than that, it takes time to build up a portfolio/resume/references to prove to employers that you have those needed skills and experiences.
So as a general rule income will go up with age. But people start retiring in their sixties, for some people in their early sixties. Also, some others that do not fully retire will transition into a career with less stress and correspondingly less income. So, average income for the population as a whole is likely to start plummetting by that point.
So, for the population as a whole, peak income would come in the mid to late 50s with a rapid drop off afterwards. There are of course many outliers. Most athletes and startup founders for instance will pass their peak long before that, but they make up a small portion of the population as a whole.
I have always privately thought this is gratuitously inefficient and severely unfair to both most twenty-somethings and nearly all highly productive workers, regardless of age.
(My productivity in programming has demonstrably increased 100% in the last two years as I've become much better at web development. In my business, this means I make rather more money than I used to. In my day job, 2.5% raise compounded twice, yippee?)
> Mark Montgomery, 53, was let go from an Owens Corning insulation factory in April and can't afford his $575 monthly mortgage payment.
What, local WalMarts aren't hiring?
What a strange thing to say, since for heads-of-households, survival is the only reason one would work an entry level job at WalMart.
There is not an endless supply of low wage survival jobs at the bottom of the market. That's why even illegal immigration is slowing.