Hacker News Reader

1. Someone invented Bitcoin.

2. Dorian Nakamoto is someone.

3. Therefore, Dorian Nakamoto invented Bitcoin.

I fail to see the fault in that flawless logic?

I verified this with a venn diagram.

1. It could be possible that Satoshi Nakaomoto does not exist or Bitcoin does not exist.

2. Therefore no one has invented Bitcoin or someone has invented Bitcoin.

3. Because each part of the proposition is equally likely we have to infer that we don't know whether Bitcoin was invented.