Hacker News Reader

Comment by Ygg2 | Hacker News Reader

Agreed. This did nothing to make me really excited about Clojure or Lisp. A demonstration of differential was a better example than this.

View on HN

It's not really intended as an "evangelist" post. It's just describing some details that makes a big difference to me in my day-to-day work. I guess it's more of a "hey, fellow Clojure programmer, don't you agree that these details really put the icing on the cake?" kind of post.

Maybe the other post I posted the same day would give newcomers a better impression of what using Clojure is like in practice (lots more code, more in-depth): http://cjohansen.no/building-static-sites-in-clojure-with-st...

The 'to die for' is too strong.

ps: what is the min* function ? can't find anything on google

It's an expression of enthusiasm, don't take it so seriously.

min* is like min but takes a list, it's not built in. Yes, I know about apply, I still prefer min* to (apply min) in certain cases.

Thanks, I was just affraid I'd missed some kind of builtin macro or convention. At one point I thought that -> would rewrite function #"\*$" to decorate them with apply ... paranoid noobies you know.

ps: you're a very enthusiastic person ;)

One thing that will help a lot: type (source f) to see the source code for a function or macro. Also (doc f) for documentation.

thanks for writing it. i have yet to grok or embrace Lisp-family languages, but your post was still fun to read.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com