Are you still a boy? Yes or no? How about a black man? Is he appropriately described as a "boy" or do you value your life?
Are you still a boy? Yes or no? How about a black man? Is he appropriately described as a "boy" or do you value your life?
Historically, in countries such as the U.S. and South Africa, "boy" was not only a 'neutral' term for domestics but also used as a disparaging racist insult towards men of colour (especially of African descent), recalling their subservient status even after the 20th century legal emancipation (from slavery, evolved to race segregation, viz. Apartheid) and alleged infantility, and many still consider it offensive in that context to this day since it denotes that men of colour (especially of African descent) are less than men.
I'm still not sure why he mentions race when the topic at hand is age, gender, and language, though.
A what? A "direct implication"? Those words are antonyms. You do understand the difference between "direct" and "implication", yes? An implication is by definition indirect.
http://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/implication
Quote: "An implication is something that is suggested, or happens, indirectly."