Hacker News Reader

Comment by codelap | Hacker News Reader

This isn't about UEFI, I've had no issues with it. Primarily because I don't use Windows on it. Microsoft is up to it's old tricks here. Then again, try to run OSX on a Dell. I just wish all these guys would get their heads out of there asses.

View on HN

> try to run OSX on a Dell

I don't get what you're trying to say here, so pardon me if this response is totally orthogonal to your point.

OS X isn't supposed to be run on PC's (laptop+desktop). Nor is it expected. Desktop Linux, however, is.

Except that OSX does run on PC's. The architectures are identical now. My MacBook Pro can run windows natively because it is an x86/x64 architecture from the ground up.

Yeah, it's called the Hackintosh

I am aware of the architecture of Mac hardware. But OS X doesn't have driver (thus hardware) support for all (or even a large range of) hardware that conform to the architecture. Apple develops (espcially when it comes to optimizations) OS X expressly for it's own selection of (as opposed to general purpose) hardware. Apple also goes so far as to actively try to prevent OS X running on non-Mac hardware[0]. Contrast this with Linux, *BSDs that are developed on and for a wide range of (and general purpose) hardware.

[0]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple%E2%80%93Intel_architectur...

If there wasn't a legal constraint, then hardware manufacturers and the community would make those drivers.

Supposed to because Apple makes it hard, not because of any technical requirements.

> technical requirements.

Except when OS X doesn't have drivers for your hardware...

For a less snarky remark, please read my response to a similar, sibling comment.

True. I have a computer with no OS and UEFI and there were zero problems installing Linux. UEFI!=Secure boot

Reply on news.ycombinator.com