"Photoshop" is not a verb (and should be replaced with the equally-easy-to-say verb "enhance using Adobe® Photoshop® software") [1], but that doesn't stop people from using it as such anyway. The presence of an extra 's' doesn't impair meaning and focusing on it tends to be a distraction.
[1] http://www.adobe.com/legal/permissions/trademarks.html#photo...
1. Plural of Lego is Lego or Lego bricks
2. Kids in this day and age are lacking creativity because they never combine their Legos into a big box when they're done building the initial design
3. The makers of Legos demean girls by marketing girly sets to them.
“The word LEGO is a brand name, and is very special to all of us in the LEGO Group Companies. We would sincerely like your help in keeping it special. Please always refer to our products as “LEGO bricks or toys” and not “LEGOS.” By doing so, you will be helping to protect and preserve a brand of which we are very proud, and that stands for quality the world over. Thank you!”
Only if your pitch target is stupid, because "Octopuses" is correct according to any English dictionary you'll find.
There's a point here somewhere about the dangers of hyper-prescriptive grammar.
> Only if your pitch target is stupid, because "Octopuses" is correct according to any English dictionary you'll find.
"Octopusses" ≠ "Octopuses". Considering that the "Octopusses" line was in response to a post about the impact of an extra "s"...