The phrasing entirely bogus seems hyperbolic. She may have left out a (key?) piece of information, but does that invalidate the summary of what the team achieved?
The comment you're replying to was referring to the original, now redacted, title of the HN Post, which was "Single, female, non-tech founder with no team...and her first 1 million users", which makes the phrasing less hyperbolic.
Agreed. I would rewrite on hindsight. This is an artful retelling that misleads via omission.