She complains a bit about supervisors /PI's /consultants not graduating female students, without actually specifying how many females had the potential to graduate with the supervisor. To me this just comes off as some feminist whining, until you have actually shown that there is some sort of bias. If no females ever applied to work there, how could he / she graduate any females? I am guessing that (like CS) chemistry is a fairly male dominated subject.

I am not saying that the sexism doesn't exist, but please demonstrate it exists properly before complaining about it.