> P(A) >= P(A n B) Always holds whether or not A and B are independent
Yeah.
> The assumption being made is that the NSA can't abuse the Huawei access without Huawei being complicit.
I didn't understand that. That seems like a ridiculous assumption.
Yeah.
> The assumption being made is that the NSA can't abuse the Huawei access without Huawei being complicit.
I didn't understand that. That seems like a ridiculous assumption.