You say political, I say moral.
And you're talking as if this hasn't happened for a long time already. If a company discovered their CEO was racist they'd fire them immediately - if not for their own moral reasons then because they're opening themselves up to a volley of lawsuits. You can bet that CEOs of any decent sized company are vetted.
Do people no longer have the political right to disagree about what falls under the precept of morality though?
How immoral can a corporate officer be before they become ineligible for the position?
I mean, you mentioned racist CEOs, but what about CEOs who oppose affirmative action without actually changing their corporate policies regarding it? You ask one person and you'll hear that banning affirmative action is racist, ask another person and they'll tell you it's just enforcing fairness throughout.
Were that it was so easy to simply reduce things in a tidy bundle by slotting them in the "morals" bucket...
I would put forth that this issue has passed out of "political issue" because of its obvious trajectory.