And that is what I am trying to move to, because no two situations are exactly alike. Choose the correct weapon for the job.
If so, how can you possibly justify that?
After all, IBM helped the Nazis, so everything they touched is morally tainted.
(And no, I'm not Godwinning, just pointing out how absurd the line of thinking is when taken to extremes)
Condoleezza Rice however, is still alive and well, and is actively on the Dropbox board. The decision is easy to make, so I made it.
I agree that no two situations are alike, but principles by definition should still guide the decision making process.