Comment by SyncTheory13 | Hacker News Reader

Comment by SyncTheory13 | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

I'm not following... We are paying roughly market rates divided by the space we actually use. While it could be looked at as only being fair if each pays a percentage of their income, this (as you mentioned) reduces the benefit living with people to get cheaper rent.

I actually do make a decent bit more than my roommates, but I choose to live an extremely simple life for other benefits. If my rent was higher than it is now (to match my income), living there would not be worth it and I would get my own apartment without roommates, etc. It would also create trouble between us as I don't always find the benefit in just having them around for how great they are.

I can very well see how your situation works for you, but I do not agree that my setup is at all unfair.

As far as cleaning goes, none of my roommates have the income to constantly pay professionals... So that is why they can take a pick off the list as opposed to being assigned tasks.

I don't think your method is necessarily unfair. I just don't think it necessarily is fair, either. If all of your roommates have roughly equal views on the value of money, square footage, and various intangibles (such as, say, the quality of light in a room), then your method is probably entirely fair -- no arguments there. If, on the other hand, they each assign very different values to space or money or those various intangibles, then it's possible that -- despite paying similar amounts of money for similar amounts of space -- they are actually experiencing very unequal levels of economic utility in exchange for their rent. Which would be where something like the NYT algorithm begins to make sense, since this attempts to maximise the utility function for all parties, regardless of how they themselves define utility.

As for the cleaner: yours is a very common reaction that I get whenever I give this advice to my friends. But professional cleaners are surprisingly affordable. In multi-person households -- unless you're living close to the poverty line -- they should be entirely affordable (much less than the proverbial cup of coffee per day), and go SUCH a long ways towards reducing household drama! Have you tried actually crunching the per-person numbers? You might be surprised at the results.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com