However students hate it, mainly because its not very good.
However students hate it, mainly because its not very good.
The primary thing I was forced to use it for was assignment submission, which was primarily collections of source-code, compiled binaries and reports on them,so nothing overly large, though generally larger than the single word document I suspect the uploader was designed for, and it was horrible.
If your connection was somewhat poor the uploads sometimes randomly failed either reporting success or not reporting anything at all, sometimes it took hours to upload small files, and frequently you had to use chrome to upload, as the firefox uploader would simply fail. Even uploading from the university campus, from the same building the servers were hosted in the upload process was frequently so risky that some lecturers asked for the submission of source code in physical copies, as well as the digital submission, to ensure something got submitted they could look at.
I'd love for something better built to take over, but given how dominant moodle is in the market, I can't see it being shifted any time soon.
So maybe you had very little negative feedback because there were no channels available for your students to express such feedback?
Moodle is a broken, confusing and aesthetically unpleasant piece of software, with only one upside - it's self-hosted.
I looked into a bunch of different LMS packages when we were looking for something to run at our school and Moodle was the best of the bunch that wasn't externally hosted (legal requirement for anything with student data). Our education department has since rolled their own LMS which is almost useless in comparison, so all in all I'm pretty happy with Moodle.
I know it isn't all sunshine and rainbows and there are plenty of things it could do better but it's better than the other LMS stuff I've used as a student and better than the other stuff I've found as a teacher.
Lots of schools have been left with 1.9
Who would need to decide or take action, in order for you to upgrade?
Now it's just maintained by the small IT staff (if any) at various schools. These people may have the skills to learn how to deploy their own moodle but they sure as hell don't have the time.
I agree it does have a UI which dates back a decade and consequently not a very good UX, However moodle HQ is well aware of this problem and I expect them to crank out better UI/UX in newer versions. The lack of training aspect, I am not sure how much are they serious in tackling.
All generalizations are false, including this one.