Who gets to decide what is harmful? Do you simply defer to the courts?

Do you think Google holds a larger, equal, or smaller responsibility than the content provider who is actually hosting this "harmful" information?

In this case, I don't see anyone at fault and don't think a crime has been committed. The data presented was true and of public record.

I would see a case if Google was somehow treating this man as a special case and only indexing negative things about him, or if google treated his publicly available data differently than any other person's