I've seen those kinds of more extreme articles (and writers) on modelviewculture before, so I think it's fair to judge a publication by what it publishes. And some of these talking points were adopted by ultra-feminists.
To clarify: it seems to me that you're using the term "ultra-feminist" to belittle and to trample the points being made.
How about judging this article by what it says?
Somebody stating their views based on past experiences interacting with the community the authors are part of is something other readers might be interested in. See the post by "226jg5" below.