Pluto-Bound Spacecraft Faces Crisis | Hacker News Reader

Pluto-Bound Spacecraft Faces Crisis

scientificamerican.com

29 pointscryptoz17 comments

Open articleView on HN

This was discussed a few days ago ... unfortunately I failed to find the related link.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7780747

And it started out with this link, replaced by a better one to Nature.

Thanks. Burying the current post as dupe.

You're very welcome.

This phenomena suggests it would be useful to have a mechanism to block the future use of original links when they're changed.

Or if you end up with a better discussion the second time, it would be nice to merge the second conversation into the first thread.

Being completely ignorant of ongoing NASA or private venture space projects, if the Hubble telescope is so useful and oversubscribed (not to mention old) wouldn't it make sense to launch a few more Hubbles sometime soon?

Well, the james webb is supposed to be the successor. 2018 is the planned launch - according to wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Webb_Space_Telescope

No idea if anymore are planned.

There are a fair few other space observatories according to Wikipedia, however I suspect most of them have special missions. As I understand HST is fairly versatile with a wide range of equipment. It is also estimated to cost over $10 billion, so sending a few more up would each cost over half of NASAs annual budget :D

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_space_observatories

Didn't the NRO give NASA a couple of sets of optics from older spec Keyhole satellites ?

Looks like it!

http://www.space.com/20955-nasa-spy-satellite-telescopes-mis...

Does 10 billion for one mean that it will be 20 billion for two? Once it is designed, and the teams are in place to assemble it and run the thing, economies of scale should kick in. Would be nice if most of that 10 billion was a sunk cost, and for 20 or 30, we could send up 50 of these things.

The mirror and spacecraft are old, but all of the instruments are relatively new, having been put into the spacecraft during the last servicing mission[0].

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-125

Surely you have a few dozen billion dollars lying around?

Not me personally, but $10B being 0.3% of the annual US budget, I'd rather send up a couple more telescopes than fund a couple more months of war. [0]

[0] ...or thereabouts. https://www.nationalpriorities.org/cost-of/

Edit: autocorrect.

There's no money for it and there probably isn't enough enthusiasm for it in Congress. The US economy is $15 trillion dollars. We spend $40 billion on pet food to give you and example of the money the US consumer has.

Perhaps, someday someone will figure out how to tap into that pile of cash for Big Science.

Money has already been mentioned, so has James Webb space telescope. But also worth mentioning is that advances in optics (active and adaptive optics, better mirror manufacturing processes) and image processing has made earth-based telescope a viable alternative for space-based telescopes.

It's a lot cheaper to build (and fix!) telescopes on the surface of the earth (in a few select locations like the Atacama desert, the Canary islands and mountains on Hawaii) and the best of current telescopes can deliver images with similar quality to what the Hubble space telescope can produce.

Kind of reminds me of the kids who would show up to an exam and then have to ask around to borrow a pencil because they didn't come prepared.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com