Hacker News Reader

Comment by sliverstorm | Hacker News Reader

Windows is par for the course. If you want to develop for FPGAs, I suggest you accept Windows, at least to start with.

Xilinx can run on Linux and all that, but Windows is the path of least resistance, and FPGAs will give you enough trouble by themselves!

View on HN

I don't think HN is really the place to accept this kind of status quo. We're not here to maintain a tradition. Somehow, I would be very glad that someone here break this barrier (not me, I'm trying to do that for the CNC world).

Our FPGA work is all done on Linux, but we're coming from the HPUX world. We've used Xilinx and Altera without any problems to speak of.

I've been doing digital design for Xilinx FPGAs, as well as IC design, for a few years now and never had any trouble with the Linux toolchain. I can't even imagine switching to Windows and trying to automate the build (not saying it's not possible, it just seems a lot more convoluted).

It's true that smaller vendors like Lattice seldom provide Linux software, but it's also rare to find bigger shops (as opposed to hobbyists) who don't use Xilinx or Altera exclusively, and Linux at that.

You absolutely can use Linux. I just recall from my FPGA days, Windows was the easiest way to get going for hobbyist FPGA work. If running Linux is what matters to you, run Linux. If developing for an FPGA is what matters to you, do what is easiest to get you there, IMO.

I don't care what people use, but this community tends to get lost in, 'well it's got to be open source...' and whole productive lines of inquiry get totally derailed.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com