Malaysia Airlines is a respected, professional airline. We have no idea what happened to either flight, and it's rather unfair to suggest Malaysia Airlines should be "shut down."
I don't think they should be shut down at all, just stating. Both /seem/ to have been mostly out of the control of the airline, aside from flying over the area, which MH isn't the only one doing.
Okay.
>On Friday, Malaysia Airlines CEO released some new information that could bolster the fire theory. Four days after denying that the plane had carried any hazardous materials, the CEO admitted that it was carrying a shipment of lithium-ion batteries in its cargo hold.
Also please don't call a company professional if it's sending planes over war zone with 200+ people on board.
Does this change your mind?
https://twitter.com/FlightCrisis/status/489806319717986305/p...
https://twitter.com/flightradar24/status/489795658879348737/...
https://twitter.com/jc_stubbs/status/489815565868216320
Is Lufthansa a professional airline? Singpore Airlines? British Airways? They, along with virtually every airline, have all been routing flights through this part of Ukrainian airspace.
Then again, perhaps your casual association of Malaysian airline officials with "ex-cab drivers" tells us all we need to know about your biases here.
EDIT: to clarify, I don't believe Malaysia Airlines should be shut down, just trying to clarify OPs comment.
Do you believe United Airlines would know such a thing?
Air France did not know what happened to AF447 for several years until the wreckage was found.
No airlines are in a position to investigate the cause of their crashes. These tasks fall to national agencies, such as the NTSB in the United States.
Airlines neither manufacture their jets, nor have access to all the territory they fly over. They merely operate them.
Unless you can point to some exceptional flaw in the management of Malaysia Airlines, it's absurd to suggest a well-respected airline should be shut down.